A 2009 study conducted by the Australian Joint Registry has
indicated the recorded failure rate of
Wright Profemur Z hip replacement system, an artificial hip implant
manufactured by Wright Medical Technology.
Metal-to-metal him implants have been originally designed to remain
functional for up to 15 years. It has
only taken three years after the implantation when failures associated to
Wright Profemur Z started surfacing, reaching up to 11.3%.
The potential of the Wright Profemur Z hip replacement
system to fret causing the device to fall apart while in a patient’s body
leading to fractured bones has been reportedly one of the common failures that
the device has been connected to. In
many cases, a revision procedure has been required in order to fix the defects
and problems that may have been caused by the hip implant.
The Wright Profemur Z hip replacement promotes a flexible
neck (“stem”) in its modular design, while traditional artificial hip implants
utilizes a fixed-neck system. Multiple components comprise the structure of the
device. Being considered as a distinct
development in artificial joint technology, it has been designed to closely
replicate a patient’s leg length, promoting a minimally invasive approach.
Its ingenious design may have been the source of the
malfunction, according to several medical professionals.
According to reports, the device’s tendency to degrade and
eventually break may have been brought about by its flexibility. The main feature of the device had some
believing that it may be the possible cause of the injuries and possible permanent
damages.
Plaintiffs from Colorado have reportedly filed a Wright
Profemur Z hip replacement lawsuit against its manufacturer in December 2010,
and January 2011. Injuries associated to
the device were the involved claims.
One of the Colorado plaintiffs’ allegedly reported that the
hip replacement’s acetabular cup was unable to attach itself to her pelvis. The
device was discovered by the performing orthopedic to be loosely connected to
the plaintiff’s pelvis during her revision procedure surgery.
The lack of regulated clinical trials has been considered by
some experts as a possible source of the Wright Profemur Z’s high failure
rate.
URL References:
http://phoenix.injuryboard.com/medical-devices-and-implants/wright-profemur-z-hip-is-an-112-failure-rate-too-high.aspx
http://www.squidoo.com/wright-profemur-z-lawsuit